The regular monthly meeting of the Palmer
Township Planning Commission was held on
Young called for the first item –
Young noted that the applicant had
appeared before the Board of Supervisors asking them to vacate their
right-of-way and that the Board felt this was a logical request as there was no
need for it for the township. Young felt
that since they would be obtaining this right-of-way that there should be
buffering along this property as there is the residential area directly across
BRUCE LOCH – Gruver Avenue – Mr. Loch was
present to review the township engineering comments which are to be forwarded
to the Zoning Hearing Board as per their request. He had to appear before the Zoning Hearing
Board for special exception and the Board requested that the township engineer
review the plan for the storm water impacts of this development. Loch explained what he wanted to do and noted
that when the home was built, if allowed, that all disturbed land will be
reseeded or sod put in place to get it back to the condition it was in. Everyone thought this was a great idea and
Rizzolino noted the sod should also be stabilized on the slope areas. The engineer’s comments were reviewed. Loch did not have a problem with these
comments and noted that the level spreader area has been eliminated. He also
stated that the driveway meets the slope requirements and that a profile will
be submitted for approval. Dillman noted
there should be a standard driveway apron which will keep the water runoff into
the roadway and not run through the property.
Dillman also suggested keeping the end of the driveway flat to disperse
the runoff. As there were no further
comments or questions on this Chairman Young called for a motion. On motion by Wilkins, seconded by Grube, and
agreed by four, Stoneback, Rickert and Grandinetti, voting no, the Commission
authorized the planning director to write a letter to the Zoning Hearing Board
forwarding comments made in regards to Mr. Loch’s site plan including
engineer’s comments dated
PALMER SUPER CENTER – Nicholas Street – Mr. Ken Trionfo and Daniel Ebner along with engineer Mike Russek were present with a sketch plan for a new concept of retail stores being built in the existing parking lot area on the east side of the Redner’s store, off of Nicholas Street/Filbar Street. There will be approximately 14 to 16 specialty stores. The parking calculations must be figured and the parking on the Stones Crossing side must be figured out. The applicant encourages the pedestrian traffic as well as vehicular traffic. There will be restrictions on the vehicle speed throughout this area. They would like to get an access to the bike path which would encourage more pedestrian traffic. There will be two buildings fronting both Nicholas Street and the on-site through street. These buildings will have front facades facing both streets. Representatives of the Redner’s Market have been notified and they are very happy with this proposed plan. The consensus of the Commission was that they feel it is a great idea and concept for this area and this is what the township needs, pedestrian stores; smaller specialty stores. Young noted the truck traffic that goes to the rear of Redner’s and he was told they will still be able to do their deliveries but that the deliveries for these stores will be smaller trucks and will just park, unload and leave right away. Engineer’s comments were reviewed and the Commission thanked the gentlemen for appearing tonight and look forward to working with them in the future.
STOWAWAY SELF STORAGE – There were no representatives for this application present. Jensen spoke to the Commission on what the request is. The storage unit owner wants to increase the units by constructing more to the north of the existing units off of Corriere Road. The applicant is aware that they need zoning approval to get a variance for the setback requirement. The Commission feels should the applicant get relief from the required 150’ setback there should be excess buffering other than what is required that there should be landscaping as well as a berm. On motion by Young, seconded by Wilkins, and agreed by all, the Commission authorized the planning director to write a letter to the Zoning Hearing Board on behalf of the Planning Commission stating their comments in regards to the buffering to the of the westerly boundary of the property.
PUBLIC COMMENT – None
There was discussion with the Commission, Solicitor, Engineer and Planning Director on procedures, review process, who is responsible for what as far as the ordinance is concerned, process of inspections, and who does inspections on new developments and that complete process.
Young asked the Commission if they would like to get paid monthly, quarterly, yearly. Commission agreed to quarterly.
On motion by Stoneback, seconded by Grube,
and agreed by all, the Commission adjourned the meeting at
Diane Grube, Corr. Sec.