PALMER TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION 

PUBLIC MEETING                      MAY 11, 2010               7:00 P.M. 

PALMER LIBRARY COMMUNITY ROOM

 

      The regular monthly meeting of the Palmer Township Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. with the following in attendance.  Vice Chairman Virginia Rickert, members Rich Wilkins, Ron Grandinetti, Bob Blanchfield and Chris Briglia.  Also present was Planning Director Cyndie Carman, Engineer Brian Harman, Solicitor Charles Bruno and associate Solicitor Rich Wenner.  Supervisor Liaison Robert Lammi was also in attendance.  Rickert convened the meeting by leading those present in the Pledge to the Flag.

 

Minutes of Public Meeting of March 9, 2010 – (no meeting in April) – On motion by Grandinetti, seconded by Blanchfield, and agreed by all, the minutes were approved.

 

OLD BUSINESS –

 

1.   Northwood Retail Center – Rt. 248 – Strausser Enterprises –  Preliminary/Final Land Subdivision and Land Development Plan – Domenick Colangelo, Finelli Consulting Engineering and Bill Hissam were present representing the applicant, Gary Strausser.  Colangelo discussed the Township engineer’s letter and questioned the extent of the letter and Brian Harman responded that there were multiple items that had to be addressed.   Colangelo stated they have worked on these issues with the engineering department.    He stated they understand that PennDOT comments and the traffic study are an issue.   Harman stated the PennDOT permit is contingent with the plan and feels this is something that has to be done.   Bruno discussed an issue that is a requirement and the Township has not received this information yet.  This pertains to the submitting of a residual land sketch plan.  Hissam stated this was discussed at the last meeting and he stated then that they have no idea what is being done with this land – as of right now it is just a field.  There is nothing in the works.   He also stated they would like to move forward with this project and feels the letter is extensive and surprised that there is a non-recommendation by the engineer.   He felt there is nothing except clean up items.  Wilkins asked if they agree with everything in the letter and Hissam stated no that they did not.   Hissam asked if there is something that is holding them back that is so extensive and Harman stated that holding up a plan for the PennDOT permit is not allowed but there is not an approved traffic study and this is the concern of the engineer.  This study could show something else that would be needed that we do not know of at this time.  Harman commented on their letter dated April 9, 2010, first comment in regards to the Township having an ultimate plan for improvements to the intersection of Rt. 248 an Kingston Road which includes signalization.  He has concerns on this statement stating that the Pidcock Company is not doing any work for Palmer Township for a project in this area.  He wondered what this was about.   Robert Lammi stated that when this full plan came in there was discussion on the light at that intersection but when Sheetz was dropped from the project the light was not needed.  He stated he has no idea why PennDOT was told that the Township was planning to do something at this intersection, why has this even been discussed.  It is not a true statement and PennDOT needs to be notified of this.   Lammi wondered why the traffic engineer is discussing this with PennDOT when we have absolutely no plans to do anything there.  This definitely has to be straightened out with them.    Hissam asked if there is anything in the letter that is other than clean up items that would hold this up.  Harman feels there are substantial items that need to be checked and resolved, storm water for one.   There are changes that need to be made to the plan and reports.  Rickert stated the letter has so many items that need attention.   Briglia stated he would like to see revised plans and a new comment letter from the engineer.  Blanchfield and Grandinetti feel the same, there are too many items that need to be cleaned up.   Wilkins also stated there are too many issues and feels it is not ready for the Board of Supervisors’ review.  Colangelo stated the storm water issue is something that needs to be done but doesn’t feel these calculations should hold up this plan as well as the traffic study comments.  If they submit information to PennDOT they will not have a reply for almost 2 months.    Hissam stated they are under contract with CVS and there is a deadline with them.  Colangelo stated he does not have a problem with any of these clean up issues and will make all these revision on the plans.   Harman stated again that there are traffic study issues that need to be completed which could require other issues to be included on the plan.  Rickert asked if the two engineering firms have met on this and Harman stated not recently but Colangelo has spoken to some personnel in the office.  Carman stated the one issue she feels is a concern is the street improvements being proposed and Colangelo stated this is all on the plan.  Carman stated this is still subject to PennDOT’s approval. Waivers/deferrals – Colangelo stated some of these were discussed at the March meeting.  Rickert feels there are too many issues and that the plan should be reviewed with these changes.  Briglia stated that if the PennDOT review is a substantial review he feels this applicant should come back to this Commission for another review.   Some Commission members feel these comments are manageable since they are just clean up items.  Wilkins still feels they should wait until the PennDOT report comes back.  Grandinetti motioned to recommend approval subject to the following conditions:  all comments of the Township engineer’s letter dated May 7, 2010 are satisfactorily addressed; all Township departmental comments dated May 10, 2010 are satisfactorily addressed; all waivers and/or deferrals that are listed be approved by the Board of Supervisors which are to request a waiver from the maximum inside slope of the detention basin embankment; the improvements along Rt. 248, Northwood Avenue, Kingston Road and Van Buren Road and Kingston Road until other adjacent sidewalks are constructed in the area; request deferral of ROW dedication along Northwood Avenue, Van Buren Road and Kingston Road; waiver for the residual lands sketch because future improvements to be made to the site area still unknown; request using another datum for the site benchmark.  A conversion note was added to the plan and a waiver to construct a Rain Garden within 100 feet upgradient from a proposed structure and within 100 feet setback from property line.  Also that voluntary traffic contribution and recreation fees are addressed to the satisfaction of the Board of Supervisors; and that the extent of traffic improvements required is resolved to the satisfaction of PennDOT.    Motion was seconded by Blanchfield.  Rickert called for a vote which was yea 4, Wilkins voting no. 

 

 

NEW BUSINESS –

 

1.       Larry/Lois Rappa – Minor Subdivision – 2400 Northwood Avenue  Andrew Temmel,

of Keller Consulting Engineer was present with Larry Rappa with proposed plans to subdivide an existing 3.88+/- acre lot into two lots.  Lot 1 will contain an existing dwelling, pool and accessory building.  A dwelling and associated driveway are proposed to be constructed on Lot 2 which would be a flag lot.   Temmel stated they have received the HOP from PennDOT.  Briglia asked why no driveway apron.  Temmel explained the reasoning and Harman noted the Township has standards for aprons; that is what the waiver is being requested for.  They have received their approval letter from Met-Ed in regards to the installation of a driveway, water and sanitary sewer line within their easement.   Applicant submitted some waivers which pertain to the widening of Northwood Avenue.  An additional right-of-way width of 13.50 feet is proposed for dedication to Palmer Township; a waiver from SALDO for the installation of sidewalks and the installation of the driveway apron and a waiver for the installation of curbing.  Wilkins motioned that this plan be recommended for approval by the Board of Supervisors conditioned that the waivers requested all be deferrals; that all comments of the Township engineer’s letter dated May 7, 2010 be satisfactorily addressed as well as Township departmental comments dated May 10, 2010 and that all voluntary traffic contribution and recreation fees are addressed to the satisfaction of the Board of Supervisors.  Grandinetti seconded the motion, and it was approved by all. 

 

2.      Richard Stocker/Kathy Carlson – Minor Subdivision - Van Buren Road/Newlins Mill

Road – Domenick Colangelo of Finelli Consulting Engineers was present with plans for this minor subdivision.   He stated their attorney would be at next month’s meeting to discuss any questions the Commission had.  This proposed plan is for a 45.3 +/- acre tract located along the west side of Van Buren Road, to be subdivided into two lots.  There is no further development proposed at this time.  Lot 1 would contain an existing driveway opposite the Newlins mill Road intersection, the existing drainage and sanitary sewer easement and a portion o the Schoeneck Creek 100-year floodplain.  Lot #2 is proposed to contain the existing drainage and sanitary sewer easement, a gas line r/w and a portion of the Schoeneck Creek 100 –year floodplain.  The site is zoned PIC.  Colangelo stated he will make the revisions as stated in Township engineer’s letter, he has no problems with the comments of the Township engineer.    He stated part of the project is in Lower Nazareth Township.  There is to be a courtesy review by Lower Nazareth Township.  Wilkins motioned to table action on this plan.  It was seconded by Briglia.  Rickert asked if there were any comments or questions by the audience. 

 

Mr. Richard Milberg – Edinburgh Drive – asked what the plans were for this subdivision.  Colangelo stated there are no ideas for this.  Milburn asked what the area was zoned and he was told PIC.

 

Seeing no further questions or comments Rickert asked for a vote which was approved by all.  

 

Planning Director’s Comments – None.

 

Public Comments – None.

 

On motion by Rickert, seconded by Wilkins, and agreed by all, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m.

 

Diane Grube, Corr. Sec.